Example Of Dental Nurse Cover Letter

Video recordings of OS-repositories, web

Already available on the website of the Fourth Workshop OS Repositories video recordings of presentations, debates, communications, and workshops. The recordings are in the section of the conference program , the corresponding activity with pdf files of each presentation.

Thus, the organization of the conference available to all interested parties the contents of what had been said and discussed, both in pdf and video.

Lay's Bar-b-q Vegetarian

barriers to open access open access

The teacher, an admirer of the city of Barcelona, \u200b\u200b Charles Oppenheim (Loughborough University) presented the financial barriers to access facing abierto en su comunicación “ The Economy of Open Access ”.

En su entretenida e interesantísima comunicación, explicó las reglas del juego económico. El modelo económico de suscripción conocido como “bid deal”, de compra consorciada, aparentemente permite a las bibliotecas adquirir muchas publicaciones a un mejor precio, además que les permite negociar con los editores unas mejores condiciones de compra. Pero las obliga a pagar por algo que no saben si será lo suficientemente bueno como para utilizarlo, sin olvidar de que están financiando a la editorial al pagar por adelantado, los editores dejan de correr riesgos, trabajan sobre seguro. El OA ha abierto new economic models, and some worry the rapporteur, specifically that of "Author pays", wherein if the library has not paid, the institution continues to pay (the author does not usually pay out of pocket), that is, it continues to fund to the publisher. And if the item is rejected, which has already been paid, you lose! Considered that OA is a good alternative for new publications that want to be known as PLoS . That is one thing. On the other are the repositories that are not exactly cheap to create or maintain, especially when it has to convince the authors to deposit in them, as the Depot . Name one of the arguments put forward by publishers: many non-OA publications in quality (after publication in OA wanted to recruit him as editor in exchange for advertising "any" of his articles without peer review and free) ... and this is how you reach the root of the problem, what is being paid?

In January 2009 the report was published that revolutionized British publishers. Written by Australian economist John Houghton , the rapporteur and other partners, provides economic data show that the British Exchequer can save up to 100 million pounds if academic journals publish in open access. The angry response was immediate, commercial publishers be branded antieditorial report, that the report contained errors, which researchers did not contact them. What the editors did not mention is that the authors of the report if you contact them, but did not obtain the information requested by the latter "confidential." Moreover, since the editors have found errors in the report, they say that ... have not done.

Institutional repositories not only face economic barriers but also barriers to use, access to knowledge. Mireia Ribera (UB) in his presentation on " The Accessibility repositories "told us it is a myth that blind people use braille to surf the web, use the audio. Hence the importance of creating well-structured repositories, allowing the presentation of content in different ways, the xml element DTBook makes it possible. Developing repositories that allow visually impaired users to use tools like Jaws , TextAloud or ZoomText, allowing the text to hear it is a necessity, an obligation. For this it is important to get the digital rights to allow the processing of information. Bank oresentó a technical proposal for how to accessible institutional repositories today, introducing standards as DAISY in the flow of the repositories. Technical tools exist and ethical reasons as well. No one can speak of open access if a significant portion of users do not have access to it.

Grelda Ortiz

Compound Interest Recurring Deposit Formula

Heroes

In the paper " Validator open access policies," Reme Melero (CSIC) presented Melibea tool (as Dulcinea tool , is named after a character in English literature, in clear analogy to the tools Sherpa-Romeo and Juliet Sherpa-).
Melibea is a directory and a validator open access policy. As a directory of open access policy seeks to institutional policies and analyzes the terms expressed in them. And validator, calculate the percentage of OA institutional policy. The institution that obtains at the moment, the highest note is the National Institute of Health (NIH ). Unlike Sherpa
-Juliet and Roarmap , Melibea difference between universities, project funders, research institutions and government institutions. This validator locates OA policies and applies 24 questions, responses and variables which have a specific weight, the percentage is calculated validated open access.

Melibea only takes into account the policy documents, expressed in writing, and difference if a recommendation or a requirement (obligation), giving a different value. The speaker said that when comparing different policies, it was found that the models are drafted several (suggested unifying criteria, as the Finns), and although the intention of the institutions is good, at the time of shaping the role does not play .

In the "frequency analysis load in large central repositories and institutional repositories ", paper presented by Luis-Millan Gonzalez, Fernanda Peset, Antonia Ferrer and Rafael Aleixandre (UPV-UV) using a tool similar to Melibea ROAR. This paper presents the results of statistical analysis of 50 repositories, data comparing 2008 with 2009, to determine the frequency of their burden. At the study's authors called attention to the loading frequency is every 50 days, which is not a continuum, and that affects users in that they have to refresh your searches every 2 months.


Other communication in which tools are also used Melibea equivalent is the presented by Paul de Castro (CSIC), "Are our repositories strong enough to take on institutional mandates? . " The speaker explained that in the international open access policies, no studies on teams that manage the repositories. Hence the question of whether the repository will be able to take these mandates. Among the teams surveyed (15 in Spain consolidated repositories) gives interesting facts as IT staff is small, the teams that manage are made on average between 5 and 6 people, and most tend to the automation of processes in the repository. Concerned that the perception general it is not necessary a strong team for the creation and maintenance of a repository, and as noted by the rapporteur, with the implementation of institutional mandates, the burden of repositories increase. What if human and technological resources of institutional repositories are insufficient? Superman will not come to our aid. Ortiz Grelda

Short Form Deed Of Trust Form California

Different looks at open access

Stakeholders in the open access was the second panel, which already has provided a review Lluís Anglada on his blog, in which each participant provided a different view of OA.

The dialogue was
researcher and a PhD in biology Roderic Guigó Serra, who brings the user's view of OA. Moreover, she stressed that bioinformatics research, everything is open access, from software (linked to the UNIX operating system and GNU tools since its inception, now own foundation) to the data from the Human Genome Project . Everything is in the public domain, both the most cited papers in bioinformatics (according to the Web of Science), as the program to view the genome and generate your map (the gff2ps ). Why? In 1996 the community bioinformatics scientific (what hope the rest?) adopts the agreements Bermuda, where it states that within 24 hours, are to announce the project data to the scientific community has access to them. Thus, the laboratories that participated in the Human Genome Project deposited in OA repositories (GenBank for example) the data before they could publish any results. End the monopoly of data, so the restrictions. Encode projects and Personal Genome are a call to make the community understand that access to information is better than information privacy. With the genome data of an individual is not got nothing, with the data of hundreds of millions of people can advance knowledge. Discussion continued

Frans Lettenstorm, published by Springer, who gave a brief overview of the publication of scientific journals from their beginnings to the present. He mentioned the changes taking place in "the past" scientific publishing business: he spent the role the digital media, subscription to the payment of licenses, individual to the consortial purchase. This is again changing, and not only wants access to text pdf file, but the multimedia document, no longer satisfied to take a look at the article but of power and full-text search on all items.

interesting was the metaphor used to describe the current climate of change in publishing: the Internet is the meteor that will disappear from the face of the earth to the scientific serials on paper. Just survive electronic scientific publications are not misfits. Hence OA Springer participate in projects to learn and survive, and not be ill-suited.

The editor of Collectanea mathematical analysis Matermatica , Joaquim Ortega (UB), enriched the discussion by providing the point of view of a small publisher of a magazine specializing acedémica. Work in a small niche market, retain the copyright of their writers, although they are encouraged to deposit their articles in OA institutional repositories (with 5 years though). Do not know how much it cost to publish an article because they have hidden costs such as working hours of staff of the academy that is not counted. Also, consider a myth that researchers demand publishing in OA, as their authors do not require copyright models (the authors did not look at whether a journal is OA or payment, they look at the impact and prestige). Ortega is convinced that the dissemination of knowledge and not achieved only through magazine articles, but also in conference presentations and databases. Academic publications are focusing on business groups, enabling them to have greater visibility than can be obtained from the university. Hence, the only thing left for the journal is quality control through peer review, and uphold the prestige published in that journal. He believes that magazines will survive are those that emphasize quality control and does not believe that the influence or favors open access to scientific publication.

Finally, Didac Martinez provided the vision a librarian optimistic. Listed OA resources available to the UPC, including CanalUPC.tv (which does not preclude having the channel on Youtube UPC). The institutional policy of the UPC is open access. Now teachers have to deposit in institutional repositories of the UPC, which can be accessed from UPCommons . The library prepares reports using this data, have a observatory scientific production, making studies of the positioning of teachers in the UPC in the world, for example. What the library has learned along the way is that they can realize the philosophy of open access. Their improvement projects, to benefit ict to redirect content to incorporate OA projects within the communication projects of the university, connecting with authors to give more visibility or manage, retrieve and preserve the knowledge of the UPC, a good reputation and importance, and confidence of the political sector of the university. Martinez asserts that Internet technologies are here to stay and face this fact, advised to follow 10 targets:

First, to evaluate the repositories with the authors to design them according to user needs. Second, improve the positioning of repositories in the international rankings to gain visibility of the university and the authors. Third, do not do everything well, has to customize the repository (as reports), and has to provide value added services (information for teachers about copyright). Fourth, more open repositories, not just the result of research articles, but also the data investigated. Fifth, build repositories interoperable. Sixth, by default the articles published in trade journals to be deposited in institutional repositories (remember Suber commented when negotiating with the publishers to get the exemption for institutional repositories?). Seventh, create repositories of teaching (increase in students taking notes on pc). Eighth, open repositories 2.0 tools, connect to social networks and enrich the user input (Margaix and said the benefits of including these social tools in the repositories). Ninth, the innovative idea to join forces with the editorial staff of the university and publishing digitally in OA, that financial resources remain with the researcher. And finally, innovate, together, unity is strength.

questions were not short. Of all the most controversial rescue, the quality. To confuse quality with popularity. Or to cite an article because is bad, ergo this article is not quality. Or the editor will not publish the article (of quality) because it is politically counter rector of my university. Or that Einstein's most cited papers are the most cited in ISI. Or bad deal mounted, the university pays for the research, the researcher gives article to get prestige and pay back the university to access the article through the library.

advancing scientific knowledge network, its agents are not. Ortiz Grelda